A simple path towards accreditation
MEDAD IEP makes accreditation management straightforward by giving universities and colleges a powerful framework and tools for managing national and international accreditation processes in one centralized accreditation management system.
MEDAD accreditation system offers a proprietary, automated workflow management framework that mirrors the actual process of accreditation, from planning, writing and analyzing the responses, to channeling the approval of the response through the various stakeholders in the institution, to formulating action plans for improvement.
Standards, Narrative, Evidence, Compliance, Committees, Self-assessment, Reviewers, Timeline, Collaboration, Permissions, Planning, Collection and Evaluation, Tracking, Reporting
We make the accreditation path simple for you.
A program review process for continuous quality improvement
MEDAD IEP provides a systematic process for collecting, organizing and reporting of data relating to an academic program. The system unifies and streamlines the review process to evaluate the program’s status, effectiveness and progress, and helps to identify the program’s future direction, needs and priorities in order to demonstrate continuous improvement.
At MEDAD IEP, we also empower you with a tool for managing and articulating all your action plans for further development and improvement of your academic program—all within the platform.
The system also provides a centralized document repository for each program and a workspace to facilitate collaboration at the program level.
The program review system pulls together the key elements that are included in MEDAD IEP:
- A review of the program action plans recently completed.
- Assessment of student learning outcomes results.
- Faculty information and activities.
- Program evaluation results.
- Qualitative evaluation and narrative.
- Attached documentation.
MEDAD IEP program review process helps to:
- Ensure quality and excellence of academic programs.
- Provide a streamlined process for reviews.
- Provide evidence for continuous quality improvement.
- Strengthen planning and decision making based on data.